Faster delivery.
Focused web MVPs typically launch in about 15 days once scope is locked.
AI helps us move faster. Senior engineers make every decision that matters.
We use AI tools like Cursor and Claude Code every day. They let a small senior team ship a focused MVP in about 15 days. But speed is only useful if what ships is correct, secure and maintainable, so we're deliberate about where AI writes code and where it doesn't.
AI is very good at producing code that works for the case you describe. It's not good at knowing what your business needs, what can go wrong, or what a mistake costs. That part is our job.

"AI tools changed how fast we can build, but they didn't change what makes software good. An AI will happily add a fallback that keeps your app running when a security check fails. A senior engineer knows that's exactly when the app should stop. We use AI for speed and keep the judgement for ourselves."
AI-written code goes through the same review as code written by hand. Nothing ships because "the AI said it works."
AI tends to add fallbacks so code keeps running under every condition. In auth, permissions and payments, we remove them. If a secret is missing or a check fails, the request is refused.
Sign-up, login, payments and your core workflow get automated tests, so the next change (AI-written or not) doesn't silently break them.
We don't paste API keys, passwords or real customer data into prompts.
AI often generates more code than a problem needs. We cut it back, because every extra line is something you'll maintain later.
Focused web MVPs typically launch in about 15 days once scope is locked.
AI makes us faster; you still get a written fixed quote before work starts.
Reviewed, tested and documented, not a pile of generated files.
100% of the code and IP, in your own repository.
A Reddit growth and lead-generation SaaS, scoped tightly, built by a small senior team with an AI-assisted workflow, and reviewed before every release. See case studies
We also take over apps founders built themselves in Lovable, Bolt, Cursor or Replit. The pattern is almost always the same: the app works, but database rules, secret keys, permissions or payments need an engineer before real customers arrive. Read our Lovable and vibe coding security checklist.
You do. All code we write for you, whether typed by hand or generated with AI and reviewed by us, is yours, along with the IP, from the repository in your account.
Your source code is processed by the AI coding tools we use (such as Cursor and Claude Code) while we work on it, the same way it would be by any developer using these tools today. For client work we use privacy mode in Cursor. We don't put secrets, passwords or real customer data into prompts. If your project has stricter requirements, tell us before we start and we'll agree on the setup in writing.
A prototype shows the idea works. A production product also handles real users, real payments and real data safely: permissions checked on the server, database access rules, tested payment logic, monitoring and backups. More on this in when an AI-built app needs a real engineering team.
Mainly Cursor and Claude Code for development. We pick tools for the job, and the tool never decides what ships; a senior engineer does.
Not reliably. AI can produce large amounts of working code quickly, but complex products need someone to own the architecture, the data model and the trade-offs. Without that, you get an app that works in a demo and gets harder to change every week.
Usually faster, which keeps fixed prices lower than they'd otherwise be. Most focused MVPs we build land between $3,000 and $10,000. See MVP development cost in 2026.
Tell us what you want to build, or send us the AI-built app you're stuck on.